Research project · 2023—2024

Authoritarian Patterns in Belarusian School Education

How schools reproduce models of power — and whether educators can resist them

European Humanities University Iryna Sidorskaya — member of the research team

About the research

Schools do not exist in isolation from the political and social system

What the project examined

The project “Authoritarian patterns in school education: pedagogical attitudes, communicative practices, and emotional regimes” examined how authoritarian models are formed, normalised and reproduced in Belarusian schools — and what possibilities exist for overcoming them.

What we mean by these patterns

The project treated them not as traits of individual administrators or educators, but as enduring institutional rules and patterns of interaction: rigid hierarchy, the primacy of vertical relationships and restrictions on horizontal ties. An important aspect was the unaddressed legacy of the Soviet school system.

The potential of schools

They can foster independence, critical thinking, dialogue and cooperation — or reproduce rigid hierarchy and weak feedback

Research focus
01

Educators in an authoritarian system

To what extent can educators create alternative models of action and communication?

Within the broader project, Iryna Sidorskaya examined the role and potential of educators in resisting the formation and manifestation of authoritarian patterns.

This perspective makes it possible to see educators not only as people working under conditions imposed by the system, but also as agents capable, under certain conditions, of acting differently
Methodology

How the research was conducted

8 in-depth expert interviews with Belarusian educators from different professional backgrounds and positions within the school system

The project ran in 2023–2024 and included the development of a theoretical and methodological framework, research seminars, the collection and analysis of empirical data, the preparation of interim and final materials, and the presentation of findings in academic settings.

What the interviews revealed

The extensive professional experience of some participants made it possible to trace changes in Belarusian schools across much of Belarus’s post-independence period

Findings

What the study revealed about the role of educators

Personal stance matters, but the ability to act differently depends on the institutional environment

01

Educators’ capacity to act is structurally constrained

When the system itself reproduces authoritarian models, acting according to its rules is easier than consistently resisting them. Much depends on school administration, the professional environment and the presence of horizontal ties.

02

Authoritarian practices constrain professional agency

They affect not only relationships between teachers and students, but also reduce educators’ own autonomy, opportunities for professional fulfilment, decision-making and influence over the educational process. The short-term organisational effectiveness of such practices also contributes to their reproduction.

03

Resistance is possible

It is supported by a strong professional stance, supportive school leadership, horizontal professional ties and an environment in which alternative models of relationships are encouraged.

Of particular importance are “islands of freedom” — local environments in which autonomous and horizontal relationships can exist as more than individual exceptions
04

The system has a gender dimension

Belarusian schools have a predominantly female workforce. Informal organisational rules, expectations of loyalty and mechanisms of pressure within such workplaces affect educators’ ability to resist authoritarian practices.

From the educator to the system

The problem cannot be reduced to “authoritarian teachers”

Individual behaviour is shaped by an environment that encourages some patterns of action while making others more difficult and risky

Belarusian schools are not only influenced by an authoritarian state. Through everyday educational, managerial and communication practices, they can themselves become a mechanism for reproducing authoritarian order.

Overcoming authoritarian structures in education therefore requires not only changing the behaviour of individual educators, but also restructuring the institutional conditions in which they work.

Practical outcome
12 recommendations for overcoming authoritarian patterns

What needs to change

The recommendations concern decentralising the education system, increasing school autonomy, changing the principles of educational management, developing horizontal professional ties and educators’ agency, and fostering a culture of dialogue, self-respect, mutual respect and critical thinking.

Full article and 12 recommendations ↗
Project

Research team and support

01

European Humanities University

The research was conducted at the EHU Center for Research of Intersubjectivity and Interpersonal Communication

02

Tatiana Shchyttsova

Research project lead

03

Iryna Sidorskaya

Contributed to developing the research framework and methodology, collecting and analysing empirical data, participating in seminars and preparing the final materials

04

Civil Society Support Foundation

Supported the implementation of the research project

Presentation of findings
September
2024

Conference “Overcoming Authoritarian Patterns in School Education: pedagogical attitudes, communicative practices, emotional regimes” at European Humanities University in Vilnius.

Presentation by Iryna Sidorskaya: “The role and potential of educators in resisting the formation and manifestation of authoritarian patterns.”

Academic publication · 2025

Rola i potencjał nauczycieli w oporze przeciwko formowaniu i przejawom autorytarnych wzorców w białoruskiej edukacji szkolnej

Iryna Sidorskaya
Wschodnioznawstwo, vol. 19, pp. 45–56.

The article develops one of the central themes of the research: the educator as a potential agent of resistance to the norms and practices of an authoritarian education system.

Read the article ↗
Made on
Tilda